“Man, Soil and Time”: the Civilizational Concept of Malek Bennabi

Keywords: M. Bennabi, A. Toynbee, L. Lévy-Bruhl, Civilization, Society, Culture, Universalism, Reductionism, Modern Muslim Philosophy

Abstract

The article reviews civilizational concept by Malek Bennabi (1905–1973) – a prominent Algerian philosopher and a public person. The author analyzes two treatises by the thinker (“The Nativity of Society” (1960) and “The Conditions of Renaissance” (1949)) in comparison to the theories by famous European culture experts of the beginning of the 20th century. The present work shows that using as a basis systems by A. Toynbee and L. Lévy -Bruhl Bennabi develops his own apology of Arabic and Muslim civilization: in ‘L’Afro-asiatisme’ ideologist opinion, the latter neither genetically nor structurally differs from European and Chinese culture. In contrast with ‘motionless’ primitive societies, the civilization meets a challenge of religious or religious and philosophical doctrine, and in its development creates the relations between their personalities, the environment (‘soil’) and social experience (‘time’). These relations, according to Bennabi, consistently go through three historical periods – the era of ‘spirit’, ‘mind’ and ‘instincs’. At the end of the treatise there is a conclusion about the author’s philosophy of permanence of essential features of alive civilizations. It is also mentioned common religious and philosophical, not the sociological character of the thinker’s study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Faris Nofal, Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Philosophy (Moscow, Russia).

Research Fellow.

References

Al-Bahī M. (1957). Al-Fikr al-ʾislāmī al-hadīṯ wa ṣilatu-hu bi-l-istiʿmār al-ġarbī [Modern Islamic Thought and its Relations with Western Occupation], Cairo: Maktabat Wahbah.

Benlahsen B. (2017). Social’no-intellektual’nye osnovy podhoda Maleka Bennabi k civilizacii [Social and Intellectual Principles of Malek Bennabi’s Approach to Civilizations], Kiev: Ansar Foundation.

Bennabi M. (1986a). Mīlād al-muǧtamaʿ [Naissance d’une Société], Damascus: Dār al-Fikr.

Bennabi M. (1986b) Šurūṭ al-nahḍah [Les Conditions de la Renaissance], Damascus: Dār al-Fikr.

Bouthoul G. (1930). Ibn-Khaldoun. Sa Philosophie Sociale, Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.

Frolova E. A. (2016). Diskurs arabskoj filosofii [The Discourse of Arabic Philosophy], Moscow: Sadra, YSK.

Ibn ʿAsākir (1995). Taʾrīẖ Dimašq [The History of Damascus], vol. 10, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Ibn H̱aldūn (2005). Al-Muqaddiamah [The Prolegomena], vol. 1, Casablanca: Bayt al- Funūn.

Al-Išbīlī ʾAbū Muḥammad. Al-Ǧamʿ bayn al-Ṣaḥīḥayn [Matching between Ṣaḥīḥs], vol. 4, Riyadh.

Al-Janabi M. M. (2019). Politicheskaja ideja sovremennogo islamskogo reformatorstva [The Political Idea of Islamic Reform]. Asiatica: Trudy po Filosofii i Kulturam Vostoka, vol. 13, pp. 78–97.

Lévy-Bruhl L. (2015а). Pervobytnoe myshlenie [La Mentalité Primitive]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt.

Lévy-Bruhl L. (2015б) Sverh’estestvennoe i priroda v pervobytnom myshlenii [Le Surnaturel et la Nature dans la Mentalité Primitive]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt.

Lewis C. S. (2017). Ob’edinennye duhom i ljubov’ju [The Latin Letters of C. S. Lewis]. Moscow: Nikeja.

Al-Ṭabarānī S. (2012). Al-Muʿǧam al-awsaṭ [The Middle Dictionary], vol. 3, Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʿilmiyyah.

Toynbee A. J. (2009). Issledovaniye istoriyi [A Study of History], Moscow: AST.

Al-Ḏahabī Š. (2001). Siyar aʿlām al-nubalāʾ [Noble People Biographies], vol. 1, Beirut: Muʼassasat al-Risālah.

Published
2024-11-13
How to Cite
Nofal, Faris. 2024. “‘Man, Soil and Time’: The Civilizational Concept of Malek Bennabi”. Patria 1 (2), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.17323/3034-4409-2024-1-2-50-61.
Section
Religion and Values