The Threefold Method of Studying Religion

Keywords: cognitive science of religion, the materialist conception of history, Begriffsgeschichte (conceptual history), methodology of religious studies, the modern period, liberal theology

Abstract

This paper is devoted to methodological way of research in religious studies, which could unite three different methods: first, cognitive science of religion (CSR), second, Marxist historical materialism, third, method of conceptual history. The CSR deals with data of social and evolutionary psychology describing social processes primarily by means of natural sciences. The Marxist approach, in its turn, points out specific human traits of social interaction. In this context, the Marxism could analyze religion-state and church-state relations as a product of complicated process of production, exchange, distribution and consumption of material goods resp. as a product of class inequality and struggle. The conceptual history (in R. Koselleck’s understanding) covers a particular but nevertheless important field of building the intellectual (philosophical, political, theological) worldview which reversely influences the whole religious community changing its cultural identity. Each method does not contradict others, however, each of them explains different aspects of religious life. The CSR explains the stability of the religious tradition, Marxism – its social roots and drive belts, while the history of concepts deals with the worldview evolution of an intellectual upper class, which produces theologies. The paper is provided with an example of applying the proposed synthesis to philosophy of religion of the German Idealism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vsevolod Zolotukhin, HSE University (Moscow, Russia), Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia).

Doctor of Letters (Theology), Assistant Professor.

Main Researcher, Head of the Centre “State and Religion in Asia”.

References

De Wette W. M. L. (1822). Theodor oder des Zweiflers Weihe. Bildungsgeschichte eines evangelischen Geistlichen, Berlin: G. Reimer.

De Wette W. M. L. (1850). W. M. L. De Wette. Eine Idee über das Studium der Theologie (hrsg. Stieren A.), Leipzig: T. O. Weidel.

Müller F. M. (1996). Vvedenie v nauku o religii [Introduction to the Science of Religion]. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. Antologiya [Classics of World Religious Studies. Anthology] (ed. by A. N. Krasnikov), vol. 1, Moscow: Kanon+, pp. 31–143.

Feil E. (1986, 1997, 2001, 2007). Die Geschichte eines neuzeitlichen Grundbegriffs vom Frühchristentum bis zur Reformation, in 4 Bänden, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Rupprecht.

Fichte J. G. (1845). Johann Gottlieb Fichte’s sämmtliche Werke, Bd. 5, Abth. 2, B. Zur Religionsphilosophie, Berlin: Weit & Comp.

Kelle V. Zh., Koval’zon M. Ya. (1969). Kurs istoricheskogo materializma [A Course of Historical Materialism], Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.

Kolkunova K. A. (2014). Religiovedenie bez religii: sovremennye podhody k opredeleniyu religii [Religious Studies Without Religion: Defining Religion Today]. 750 opredelenij religii: istoriya simvolizacij i interpretacij [750 Definitions of Religion: A History of Symbolizations and interpretations] (ed. by E. I. Arinin), Vladimir: VlGU, pp. 197–221.

Koselleck R. (1974). Einleitung. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland (hrsg. von O. Brunner, W. Conze, R. Koselleck), Bd. 1, A–D, Stuttgart: Ernst Klett, S. XIII–XXVII.

Koselleck R. (2006). Begriffsgeschichten, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag

Mannhardt W. (1865). Roggenwolf und Roggenhund. Beitrag zur germanischen Sittenkunde, Danzig: Verlag von Constantin Ziemssen.

Mannhardt W. (1868). Die Korndämonen. Beitrag zur germanischen Sittenkunde, Berlin: F. Dümmler’s Verlagsbuchhandlung.

Mannhardt W. (1875). Wald- und Feldkulte. Erster Teil. Der Baumkultus der Germanen und ihrer Nachbarstämme, Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.

Molendijk A. (2016). Friedrich Max Müller and the Sacred Books of the East, New York: Oxford University Press.

Palmer D. A. (2017). Is Chinese (Lack of) Religion Exceptional? Religious Cognition in China. “Homo Religiosus” and the Dragon (ed. by R. G. Hornbeck, J. L. Barrett, M. Kang), New York: Springer, pp. 17–34.

Paul G. S. (2009). The Chronic Dependence of Popular Religiosity upon Dysfunctional Psychosociological Conditions. Evolutionary Psychology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 398–441.

Philosophisches Journal einer Gesellschaft Teutscher Gelehrten (1798), Bd. 8, Heft 1. Jena: C. E. Gabler.

Pollack D. (2016). Religion und gesellschaftliche Differenzierung: Studien zum religiösen Wandel in Europa und den USA III, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Rudolph K. (1992). Geschichte und Probleme der Religionswissenschaft, Leiden: Brill.

Schleiermacher F. (1830). Der christliche Glaube nach den Grundsätzen der evangelischen Kirche im Zusammenhange dargestellt, Berlin: G. Reimer.

Published
2024-11-13
How to Cite
Zolotukhin, Vsevolod. 2024. “The Threefold Method of Studying Religion”. Patria 1 (2), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.17323/3034-4409-2024-1-2-8-24.
Section
Religion and Values